At Sanford A. Kassel, A Professional Law Corporation, we specialize in representing employees in employment law matters, including the complexities surrounding “on duty” meal periods. This article will discuss the implications of the Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. case on “on duty” meal periods in the San Bernardino Riverside Inland Empire region.
What are “On Duty” Meal Periods?
“On duty” meal periods refer to situations where an employee is required to remain on duty during their meal break due to the nature of their work. In such cases, the employer is required to pay the employee for the time spent during this meal period.
The Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. Case
In the Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc. case, the California Supreme Court held that employees who are paid for on-duty meal periods are also entitled to meal period premiums if the employer does not have a compliant on-duty meal period agreement. This means that if an employer fails to provide a legally compliant meal break, they must pay the employee an additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate.
Implications for Employees in San Bernardino Riverside Inland Empire
This ruling underscores the importance of understanding your rights as an employee when it comes to “on duty” meal periods. If you are paid for on-duty meal periods and your employer does not have a compliant on-duty meal period agreement, you may be entitled to additional compensation.
How Sanford A. Kassel Can Help
At Sanford A. Kassel, we have a team of experienced attorneys who can help you navigate through the complexities of employment law. We can provide guidance on your rights under “on duty” meal period regulations and represent you in any disputes that may arise.
If you are an employee in the San Bernardino Riverside Inland Empire region and believe your rights under “on duty” meal period regulations have been violated, don’t hesitate to reach out to us for a consultation.
